Jump to content

Nick the Noodle

Members
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Nick the Noodle last won the day on July 25 2023

Nick the Noodle had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Nick the Noodle's Achievements

9

Reputation

  1. That is not the silliest idea I've heard. Arthur's foster father was Sir Ector in the legend, and the medieval Welsh lords when youths, were often raised by their uncles. Sir Ector equates to another legendary character, Cynyr Cainfarfog, and Irish lord of Caer Goch in Dyfed. Dyfed was almost certainly under Irish control in the 5th century. If the myth is at least partially true, Arthur's father may have be Irish, specifically from the Deisi tribe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynyr_Ceinfarfog https://www.earlybritishkingdoms.com/bios/ector.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Déisi Arthur's mother was called Eigyr. In Welsh, that means chaste or pure, and suddenly we have a Christian link to Mary, mum of a certain famous figure. That in turn casts doubt on the whole claimed parentage of Arthur. http://www.earlybritishkingdoms.com/bios/ygerna.html
  2. Another major problem is where the Saxons came from? Without a Saxon opponent, Arthurs story is pretty pointless. Germanic(ish) tribes were certainly here before Rome conquered Britain, eg Atrebates and Belgae. In fact that it was the fact that Julius Caesar heard that the Belgae had defeated the Britons, and he had beaten the European mainland Belgae, that prompted his invasion. It failed, but that's another topic. Certainly Frisians came to Britain during the climate change disaster around 200AD, that saw much of the Low Countries coastline collapse into the Channel. Then we have the Roman sources themselves. Rome did not name defensive lines after their enemies, but after the areas they protected. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxon_Shore#/media/File:Litus_Saxonicum.png
  3. The problem with King Arthur is that there is nothing written about that person at that time. This is completely important. The one author that should be writing about him is Gildas. Apparently, he did not do so because Arthur killed his brother. Gildas wrote De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae. It's rubbish as history. OTOH, Geoffrey of Monmouth might be even worse when it comes to Arthur. One person writing about Britain at the specific time was Procopius. He was a Byzantine author that wrote about a 'Saxon' invasion of Germany and Denmark, by the British/English in the 6th century, because her suitor had decided to marry another. The only written account by 'Saxons' invading another piece of land at this time, was the English invading Germanic lands, not England being invaded.
  4. Like many, I do have a theory, concerning both location and individual(s). Personally I think Arthur is a title, not a name. I will expand on it later. Got a film to watch with my spogs.
  5. If we cannot effectively travel faster than the speed of light, then even if there are Aliens out there, we'll be unlikely to discover them. This because there are Earth like planets out there, but they are many many light years away. However, what about other universes in the multiverse that touch our own, if very slightly. Any contact would be 2D rather than 3D, but the closest universes to us I would expect to be most like our own. It could explain ghosts, ie incorporal images, or flying objects with no radar signature, because don't have any mass in our universe. Just some rambling musings.
  6. Seems an appropriate topic for this forum.
  7. We have shortages all the time. No tomatoes for a while was a biggie, but recently cabbage and celery have often been non existant as well We also have a Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs of the United Kingdom, that doesn't understand her job. When we had the tomato shortage, she said eat turnips instead. Unfortunately, this was in February, and the turnip harvest was still a month away.
×
×
  • Create New...