The Death Rates from So Called Cancer Treatments

[tmcom]

We keep hearing about "you have six weeks to live unless you have surgery and chemo, and radio therapy" but is that from the Cancer or the treatment.

I actually got some straight answers from Google

Quote

What is the mortality rate for chemotherapy patients?

 

At MD Anderson, the 4-week mortality rate was <5% in younger/fit patients who received intensive induction chemotherapy, and 2% in older/unfit patients treated with lower-

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360753/

Quote

No national benchmark figures exist for early mortality due to chemotherapy unlike for surgical interventions. Deaths within 30 days of chemotherapy during a 6-month period were identified from the Royal Marsden Hospital electronic patient records. Treatment intention – curative or palliative, cause of death and number of previous treatments – were documented. Between April 2005 and September 2005, 1976 patients received chemotherapy with 161 deaths within 30 days of chemotherapy (8.1%). Of these, 124 deaths (77.0%) were due to disease progression.

They assumed that most were caused by the disease.

Quote

by J Domschikowski · 2021 · Cited by 2 — Four percent, 105 patients, died in the radiation oncology ward and were included in this retrospective study. Table 1 gives an overview of the ...

Surgery was relatively low.

Quote

Mortality rate following elective surgery was 0.17% and following emergency surgery was 10-fold higher (1.7%).

Had to go to DuckDuckgo for data on survival rates without doing anything, since Google was all the six weeks to live crappola.

Quote

5-year relative survival from diagnosis | National Cancer Control ...

Sep 29, 2022For all cancers combined, there have been increases in 5-year relative survival since 1987-1991. In the period 2013-2017, 5-year relative survival was 70% for all cancers combined, compared to 51% for the 1987-1991 period. For the cancer types analysed, the 5-year relative survival

And without doing anything.

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/rejecting-cancer-treatment-what-are-the-consequences/

Quote

In this study, the five-year survival of women that refused surgery was 72% versus 87% of women who had surgery. Adjusting for prognostic factors, the authors estimated that women that refused surgery had a 2.1-fold increased risk of death from breast cancer compared to conventional treatment.

So when you do the math, chemo mortality is averaged at 10%, (30 days) surgery not worth mentioning, radio 4%, soon afterwards, (radiation therapy usually gives you a 5 year lifespan).

And since there is nothing on survival rates for people who steer clear of this, (Middle Ages time period data is schewd) and Pretty much all data isn't reliable l am going with this cure.

https://www.asrn.org/journal-advanced-practice-nursing/1670-a-pioneering-nurse-and-her-secret-remedy-for-cancer.html

One person after another with months or weeks to live and all 100% cured.

So conventional means for a 14% chance of death from the treatment on top of surgery painful chemo and damaging radiation therapy and 10-15k out of pocket or drink some herbal tea for a 100% cure.

Lol this is pretty much the state of affairs in medicine, especially after the pandemic. All so called cures are all gene based as no one can do that in their homes and all have a destitute carrying price tag.

Let's hope that the mass exudes continues and accelerates, it deserves to considering cures are already available and very safe ones!

[YellowDragon]

Most cancer heals on its own. The body takes care of it. This is why cancer rates shot up when screening did, it was because people were finding it before it got the chance to heal. Only the most severe forms of cancer should be treated with aggressive treatment, most should be "wait and see" cases. Cancer doesn't even kill people, the die-off effect of cells does. I can't remember what it is called but if you can prevent that then cancer cannot actually kill anyone. 

Not to mention we ALL have cancer cells in our body at all times, it is just a matter of making sure our bodies are supplied with what they need to manage them and keep them from growing/expanding. 

There is so much dealing with cancer and other diseases that makes zero sense when you consider how they treat it. Like yeah we will "get rid of the cancer" but we will also be throwing your body into high-risk territory for developing more problems from it down the road using radiation. 

Stem cell treatment seems to be a better option if you want a more aggressive treatment. 

[tmcom]

6 hours ago, YellowDragon said:

Most cancer heals on its own. The body takes care of it. This is why cancer rates shot up when screening did, it was because people were finding it before it got the chance to heal. Only the most severe forms of cancer should be treated with aggressive treatment, most should be "wait and see" cases. Cancer doesn't even kill people, the die-off effect of cells does. I can't remember what it is called but if you can prevent that then cancer cannot actually kill anyone. 

Not to mention we ALL have cancer cells in our body at all times, it is just a matter of making sure our bodies are supplied with what they need to manage them and keep them from growing/expanding. 

There is so much dealing with cancer and other diseases that makes zero sense when you consider how they treat it. Like yeah we will "get rid of the cancer" but we will also be throwing your body into high-risk territory for developing more problems from it down the road using radiation. 

Stem cell treatment seems to be a better option if you want a more aggressive treatment. 

Yeah, couldn't find anything on survival rates if nothing is done apart from the probably dodgy studies shown above.

And now they are saying that the death rates from Cancer in the Middles Ages was ten times higher, lol like we will believe that after churning out fakes studies for the Covid vaccine.

I didn't really think that Cancer in and of itself could kill someone unless it blocks some vital organ. And someone may have headaches, etc as a warning that something needs to be done, (the cure above or surgery as a last resort).

Radio and Chemo should be dropped as it does more harm than good and surgery should only be used as an absolute last resort.

Yeah we all have Cancer cells in our body's and by the looks of some getting constantly chopped and cut up they are treating their body's as public enemy number one. Big Pharma and Doctors making record profits on lies and suppressing cheap and safe options are the problem.

[Cosmic]

I read so many studies on cancer and it all points to if you give the body what it needs to heal, it will heal itself. So getting your vitamin and mineral levels checked should be the first step. Correct those first. Make sure the person is drinking clean water (not chlorine or fluoridated water) and a good amount of it. Ask how their diet is and what their activity level looks like. When we don't move enough, our lymphatic system doesn't work which leads to a build up of toxins. Sleep is another thing that should be asked about. 

Treating one small area of the body when it is a massive puzzle that works and functions together never made sense to me. 

[tmcom]

11 hours ago, Cosmic said:

I read so many studies on cancer and it all points to if you give the body what it needs to heal, it will heal itself. So getting your vitamin and mineral levels checked should be the first step. Correct those first. Make sure the person is drinking clean water (not chlorine or fluoridated water) and a good amount of it. Ask how their diet is and what their activity level looks like. When we don't move enough, our lymphatic system doesn't work which leads to a build up of toxins. Sleep is another thing that should be asked about. 

Treating one small area of the body when it is a massive puzzle that works and functions together never made sense to me. 

Agreed read about a young girl with a mole on her nose that was cancerous and she died of it, l mean how can that kill someone? We would all be dropping dead everywhere if Cancer was that bad, no she very likely died of the so called treatments above.

Tucker is going to interview Putin soon and put it on X, should blow the lid on a lot of things the elites want to keep hidden especially Covid, l would say the cattle are going to wake up very soon then anger and revenge will take over.

[YellowDragon]

What amazing timing. This video details a lot o what was mentioned in this thread. I believe this ties into mind over matter and having a stronger connection to the "non-physical" realm of life. 
 

This is a great channel for all sorts of topics. 

[Cosmic]

Science cannot explain that kind of stuff. This is why I have always felt we are more than just skin and bones and how we think, speak, and act plays a role in the overall health and value of our life. I believe the bible says life and death are in the power of the tongue. I believe it.